Supreme Court recognizes GM Korea’s illegal dispatch work

Posted on : 2013-03-01 14:45 KST Modified on : 2019-10-19 20:29 KST
Decision has set a precedent that could protect workers from exploitation in the future

By Kim Jeong-pil, staff reporter

The South Korean Supreme Court made its first decision recognizing subcontracting of automobile production as illegal dispatch work, also determining that both the manufacturer and the business owner of the partner company have the same degree of criminal liability.

Despite the fact that it is forbidden for workers to be dispatched in the direct assembly lines of manufacturers, companies in the industry have been using illegal dispatch workers by exploiting legal loopholes through subcontracting. Now that the Supreme Court has set a precedent for criminal prosecution of business owners, it is expected that there will be changes in such industry practices.

On Feb. 28, the Supreme Court, presided over by judge Yang Chang-su, upheld the decision of the appeals court. The court had ruled that David Nick Reilly, the former president of GM Daewoo Motors who had been indicted on charges of violating the Act on the Protection of Temporary Agency Workers, should pay a fine of 7 million won (US$6,457). Fines of 3 to 4 million were also upheld for six other defendants who had been tried on the same charges as Reilly, including a man surnamed Kim who is president of a partner company to GM Daewoo.

"Our examination of the contract between GM Daewoo and the partner company and of the actual work process shows that the employees of the partner company are effectively dispatch workers who are dispatched to the GM Daewoo workplace where they provide work under the supervision and direction of GM Daewoo," the court said. While by all appearances GM Daewoo and the partner company had signed a contract for outsourcing, in the court's view, the work was actually illegal dispatching, which is illegal.

"The defendants were fully conscious that they might violate the Act on the Protection of Temporary Agency Workers. But even if they were not aware that their behavior violated the law, that is not sufficient reason to exempt them from their criminal liability," the court said.

"We expect that this decision will contribute to protecting workers from a situation where they are involved in illegal dispatching," a member of the Supreme Court said.

In Dec. 2006, Reilly was served a summary fine of 7 million won (US$6,456) on charges of having had 843 workers dispatched from six partner companies who had signed contracts with GM Daewoo from Dec. 22, 2003 to Jan. 26, 2005 to work on the production line. However, Reilly objected to this and requested a formal trial. In the initial trial, the court found Reilly innocent, judging the relationship to be one of legal subcontracting, but the appeals court found that it was illegal dispatching and fined the defendants.

Please direct questions or comments to [english@hani.co.kr]

button that move to original korean article (클릭시 원문으로 이동하는 버튼)

Related stories

Most viewed articles