[Editorial] How could a person charged with protecting human rights dismiss sexual slavery?

Posted on : 2024-03-13 17:09 KST Modified on : 2024-03-13 17:09 KST
Kim Yong-won, a permanent member of the National Human Rights Commission of Korea (NHRCK), reportedly stated, “We all know about the Japanese military’s sex slave problem, but what do we get out of constantly talking about it?”
Kim Yong-won, a permanent member of the National Human Rights Commission of Korea, ahead of a session of the commission's plenary committee on Mar. 11. (Kim Young-won/The Hankyoreh)
Kim Yong-won, a permanent member of the National Human Rights Commission of Korea, ahead of a session of the commission's plenary committee on Mar. 11. (Kim Young-won/The Hankyoreh)

The statement was made at a meeting of the commission’s plenary committee that was being held to deliberate the content of a report slated to be submitted to the UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW).

Kim was essentially refuting the need for the South Korean government to call for a formal apology and legal reparations from Japan regarding victims of sexual slavery under the imperial Japanese military.

It is unthinkable for a human rights commissioner to voice such ridiculous sentiments.

Not only are the Japanese military’s atrocities against women recognized as crimes against humanity and uncontested historical truths, but several courts have confirmed Japan’s legal responsibility for compensation.

In 2021, the lawsuit for damages against the Japanese government filed by victims and surviving family members was finalized, and at the end of 2023, the court repeatedly recognized the Japanese government’s responsibility for damages.

Nevertheless, the Japanese government has not made any sincere efforts to resolve past historical issues, and the Korean government has been groveling whenever it comes to diplomacy with Japan.

Under such circumstances, calling on the Japanese government to apologize and provide legal reparations is the bare minimum expected of the South Korean government.

When CEDAW Women conducts a review of the South Korean government this coming May, it is only right that this demand be included in its report. In its 2016 review of Japan, CEDAW also recommended that the Japanese government, “recognize[s] the right of victims to a remedy, and accordingly provide full and effective redress and reparation, including compensation, satisfaction, official apologies and rehabilitative services.”

However, Kim stated, “The international order is divided into blocs, with North Korea, China, and Russia forming one bloc. Japan is a much-needed ally for us to counter those forces,” and objected to the statement’s inclusion in the report. He was joined by Lee Choong-sang, another standing commissioner of the NHRCK.

Using the current geopolitical situation to cover up horrific human rights abuses is an act that goes against the protection of human rights. Not only is this damning in the eyes of the public, but it is unthinkable that such statements came from a key member of the nation’s human rights commission, whose primary responsibility is to defend human rights.

Three out of the NHRCK’s 11 members are permanent members. Kim was appointed as a permanent member by the president, and Lee was recommended by the ruling People Power Party.

The two commissioners have received complaints from various human rights organizations and were reported to the Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission. The fact that the permanent members of the NHRCK, who should act as the backbone of the commission, display such disappointing behavior is absolutely deplorable.

Please direct questions or comments to [english@hani.co.kr]

button that move to original korean article (클릭시 원문으로 이동하는 버튼)

Related stories

Most viewed articles