Japan requests formation of arbitration committee for forced labor ruling

Posted on : 2019-05-21 17:11 KST Modified on : 2019-05-21 17:11 KST
Tokyo continues to cite 1965 claims treaty as solution
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe
Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

The Japanese government has asked the South Korean government to set up an arbitration committee to deal with a judicial decision awarding damages to Koreans who performed forced labor for Japanese companies during Japan’s colonial occupation of Korea.

“More than four months have passed since we requested [bilateral] deliberations based on our claims agreement on Jan. 9. Despite repeating this request several times, the South Korean government has declined to take part in the deliberations. In accordance with our agreement, we have notified South Korea that we are referring this matter to an arbitration committee,” Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said on May 20.

Since the South Korean Supreme Court sided with victims of forced labor in their lawsuit against Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal and Mitsubishi Heavy Industry at the end of last year, Japan has objected that the ruling violates an agreement it reached with South Korea in 1965 that dealt with outstanding claims.

The two countries’ agreement stipulates that, if a dispute arises in relation to the agreement, the two sides should first attempt to resolve that dispute through diplomatic channels; should that fail, the agreement authorizes them to refer the dispute to an arbitration committee. The agreement further states that, upon receiving a request for arbitration, the two countries are to appoint committee members within 30 days and then reach an agreement about nominating committee members from a third country within 30 more days.

As a consequence, the arbitration committee cannot be set up without the consent of the South Korean government. The apparent reason that Japan is nevertheless asking for the establishment of an arbitration committee is to pressure the South Korean government and to tilt international opinion in its favor.

The next steps that Japan can take are filing a petition against the South Korean government with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and taking retaliatory measures. Just as with the establishment of the arbitration committee, no trial can be held at the ICJ without the consent of the South Korean government. Japan’s retaliatory measures could include suspending the supply of certain Japanese-manufactured parts to South Korea and restricting the issuance of Japanese visas to Korean nationals.

Japan is widely expected to move ahead with those measures when the asset sale requested by attorneys for the plaintiffs is completed and stock formerly belonging to Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal and by Nachi-Fujikoshi is liquidated.

Foreign Minister Taro Kono criticized the South Korean government while speaking before the Audit Committee in Japan’s House of Councillors on Monday. “[South Korean] Prime Minister Lee Nak-yeon said that his government is limited in the action it can take. It’s regrettable that a person in authority has made such a remark, since we’d been hoping the South Korean government would take action. [South Korea] has refused to take part in deliberations for more than four months now,” Kono said.

After Nam Gwan-pyo presented his credentials as South Korea’s new ambassador to Japan to Japanese Emperor Naruhito on Monday morning, he was summoned to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs by Vice-Minister Takeo Akiba and told that the South Korean government needs to agree to set up an arbitration committee.

By Cho Ki-weon, Tokyo correspondent

Please direct comments or questions to [english@hani.co.kr]

button that move to original korean article (클릭시 원문으로 이동하는 버튼)