Overseas media goes heavy on coverage of general elections

Posted on : 2016-04-15 17:28 KST Modified on : 2019-10-19 20:29 KST
Media outlets note the setback for ruling Saenuri Party, driven by dissatisfaction with Park administration
President Park Geun-hye gives her New Year’s address
President Park Geun-hye gives her New Year’s address

International news outlets showed a major interest in the Apr. 13 general elections, which ended in a harsh defeat for the ruling Saenuri Party (NFP).

Real-time updates were given on the results, along with numerous analyses on the election’s significance and future prospects.

“[President] Park [Geun-hye], a daughter of Park Chung-hee, South Korea’s military dictator from 1961 to 1979, has emerged as a highly divisive leader,” the New York Times noted on Apr. 13, adding that the election results “appeared to be a rejection of her style of governance.”

Describing the election as “a referendum on Ms. Park and a bellwether for the presidential election in late 2017,” the article said Park was left to “face the prospect of being an early lame duck.”

In terms of predictions, the newspaper said that “no immediate change” was expected in Seoul‘s foreign policy, but that “the progressive opposition will now be more likely to press Ms. Park to amend her hard-line North Korea policy.”

The Wall Street Journal identified economic conditions as a reason for the Saenuri’s defeat, noting that “South Korea‘s weakening economy may have turned voters away from Ms. Park’s party.”

“On Tuesday [Apr. 12], the International Monetary Fund lowered its growth forecast for South Korea for this year to 2.7%,” it observed.

“Household debt, meanwhile, has risen to a record $1 trillion as of the end of last year, while youth unemployment hit a record 12.5% in February,” it continued.

The Associated Press noted that voters “weren‘t swayed by national security issues as much as they were before,” despite recent threats and missile tests by North Korea. Instead, the article pointed to the worsening economy as voters’ top concern.

The BBC gave the election outcome headline coverage on its website, noting that it “dents President Park Geun-hye’s prospects of seeing her Saenuri party retain the presidency next year.”

The piece identified two reasons for the Saenuri defeat: its attempts to gut legal safeguards protecting workers from firing, and the suppression of left-leaning opposition parties and political opponents as “pro-North Korea.”

In Japan, news outlets focused on the potential impact of the outcome on relations between Seoul and Tokyo - and a recent agreement on the comfort women issue in particular.

During a press conference on Apr. 14, Japanese Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga fielded questions on whether the Saenuri defeat would mean problems in enforcing the Dec. 28 agreement.

“I don’t think [the election result] will have an impact on the agreement’s enforcement,” Suga said.

But Japanese media predicted the Saenuri rout would indeed mean setbacks for the agreement between the two sides’ foreign ministers on the issue of women forced into sexual slavery during Japan’s imperial days.

The Mainichi Shimbun newspaper noted that “the inevitable weakening of centripetal force for the Park administration is raising concerns about the impact on the two administrations’ agreement on the comfort women issue.”

The Nikkei newspaper predicted that with the opposition Minjoo Party of Korea winning a plurality of seats on a campaign of reopening the comfort women issue to discussion, Park “could adopt a harder line on Japan” after the defeat.

The Asahi Shimbun newspaper predicted “difficulties in signing a military intelligence protection agreement, which Japan had hoped to reach an agreement on before the end of the year.”

By Gil Yun-hyung, Tokyo correspondent

Please direct questions or comments to [english@hani.co.kr]

 

button that move to original korean article (클릭시 원문으로 이동하는 버튼)

Related stories

Most viewed articles