Supreme Court issues landmark decision in Samsung LCD workers’ industrial accident case

Posted on : 2017-08-30 17:48 KST Modified on : 2017-08-30 17:48 KST
Ruling states that a link between MS and working conditions must be acknowledged
Kim Mi-seon
Kim Mi-seon

The Supreme Court judged on Aug. 28 that multiple sclerosis (MS) cases among Samsung Electronics LCD factory workers should be recognized as industrial accidents. This is the first time the court has recognized a causal relationship between duties and illnesses in a Samsung Electronics semiconductor/LCD factory industrial accident case.

In a case filed against the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service (K-Comwel) by an individual surnamed Lee, who contracted MS while working at a Samsung Electronics LCD factory in Cheonan, the court’s third divisional under Hon. Kim Jae-hyung decided on Aug. 28 to overturn first and second trial rulings against the plaintiff and return the case to Seoul High Court. Lee, 33, had been demanding that K-Comwel’s decision not to approve [compensation for] medical case be overturned.

“Lee, who showed no symptoms prior to employment, may have experienced a complex mixture of contributions to the emergence and worsening of multiple sclerosis due to various overlapping factors, including exposure to organic solvents, shift work, lack of sunlight, and occupational stress,” the court concluded, acknowledging a substantial cause-and-effect relationship between Lee’s condition and duties.

The court also said the “inability to demonstrate the specific types of harmful substances or amount of exposure due to Samsung Electronics and the local Ministry of Employment and Labor branch’s refusal to disclose related information citing ‘business secrecy’ must be regarded as indirect evidence in Lee’s favor.”

The court’s conclusion that the MS case was an industrial accident may be seen as the result of a broad recognition of causality between work conditions and illnesses – which could serve as an important guideline for workplaces and trials in the future.

In previous rulings as well, the Supreme Court maintained that the burden of proof on workers suffering from occupational diseases as a result of exposure to hazardous chemicals should be reduced. The court determined in numerous cases that a suitable causal relationship between duties and medical conditions did not need to be proven medically or scientifically, but may be recognized through rational inference from a range of factors, including health status at the time of employment, the presence of hazards in the workplace, and period of employment.

Lee is one of four Samsung Electronics MS patients whose cases were received by Banollim, a group working on behalf of the health and human rights of industrial accident victims at Samsung Electronics semiconductor factories and their surviving family members. Two such victims recently had the industrial accident status of their conditions recognized in separate rulings by Seoul High Court. The fourth’s case is currently under industrial accident review by K-Comwel.

“We look forward to the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service and the epidemiological researchers at the Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute showing the same kind of forward-thinking attitude seen in the Supreme Court ruling,” Banollim said in a statement the same day.

“The legal system for industrial accident compensation insurance must be amended to allow for easier recognition of industrial accident status, including a shift in the burden of proof,” the group added.

By Yeo Hyeon-ho, senior staff writer and Park Tae-woo, staff reporter

Please direct questions or comments to [english@hani.co.kr]

button that move to original korean article (클릭시 원문으로 이동하는 버튼)

Related stories

Most viewed articles