Seeking resolution, U.S. offers rice to N. Korea

Posted on : 2008-03-29 09:19 KST Modified on : 2019-10-19 20:29 KST
Distribution methods to be monitored to ensure transparency
 who are having a meal in a kindergarten near Mount Myohang. The photo was taken in 2006.
who are having a meal in a kindergarten near Mount Myohang. The photo was taken in 2006.

The United States has proposed giving 500,000 tons of rice to North Korea and is working on ways to guarantee transparency in the distribution of the rice, it has been confirmed.

The news is particularly notable because it comes at a time when the six-party talks on the North Korean nuclear issue are all but stalled over Pyongyang’s declaration of its nuclear programs, and appears to be a friendly measure seeking to encourage it to move forward and make its declaration in good faith.

The 500,000 tons would be the largest amount of food aid the United States has given North Korea since the start of the Bush administration in 2001. The United States stopped providing such aid in 2005 after discord with Pyongyang arose over distribution monitoring by the World Food Program, or WFP.

South Korean foreign minister Yu Myung-hwan, talking to reporters on March 27 in Washington, D.C., said that the WFP and North Korea are engaged in discussions to determine how the food should be distributed and monitored, adding that an agreement has yet to be arrived at. “WFP officials are going to visit North Korea soon to talk about distribution with officials there,” he said.

Yu added that with a U.S. presidential election coming in November, “if a decision is not reached before August it will be hard for the current U.S. administration to take action on food aid.”

Yu also commented on the six-party talks, saying that “another round of six-party talks have to be held in at least April for there to be momentum that could carry the process over into the next U.S. administration,” Yu said.

“In 2000, U.S. President Bill Clinton ran out of time before he could visit Pyongyang,” he said. “History would’ve been different if the process had moved just three months faster at the time.”

Please direct questions or comments to [englishhani@hani.co.kr]

Most viewed articles