Scholar claims annual working hours of South Koreans are undercounted

Posted on : 2017-12-06 16:51 KST Modified on : 2019-10-19 20:29 KST
The country ranks second in average working hours among OECD nations, trailing only Mexico
People rushing to work at the Gwanghwamun junction in Seoul. (by Shin So-young
People rushing to work at the Gwanghwamun junction in Seoul. (by Shin So-young

Just how many work hours did South Koreans average last year – 2,241, or 2,069?

The annual work hours of South Korean employees – the second most among OECD member states, after Mexico – have been undercounted, one scholar claims. This is likely to trigger a debate about the standards for compiling annual work hours, a figure often used in international comparisons.

The claim appeared in a report titled “South Korea’s Work Hours Shrink at the Whim of Statistics Korea,” by Kim Yu-seon, a senior analyst at the Korea Labor and Society Institute. The report was published on Dec. 5.

“Statistics Korea’s survey of the economically active population shows that the average annual work hours was 2,241, which was 172 hours fewer than the figure of 2,069 which was submitted to the OECD. The reason for this difference is that the work hours submitted to the OECD are supposed to be based on the economically active population survey, in which data is collected directly from employees, but were instead based on a survey administered to employers.” Kim argued in his report.

There are two main methods used to calculate annual work hours. First, Statistics Korea uses the economically active population survey to ask employees aged 15 and above how many hours they worked in the week each month that contains the date of the 15th. Another method is the employer workforce survey conducted by the Ministry of Employment and Labor, which involves asking the owners of companies with five or more employees how many hours their employees work each month. These two surveys differ in who is responding (employees vs. employers), who is being surveyed (employees vs. wage earners), and what period is being surveyed (weekly vs. monthly), so the results vary as well.

Statistics Korea uses the Ministry of Employment and Labor’s employer survey to determine the annual work hours of wage earners that it reports to the OECD and uses the economically active population survey to determine the work hours of the self-employed that it also reports to the OECD. The rationale is that the employer workforce survey, which compiles work hours on a monthly basis, is more stable than the economically active population survey, which compiles work hours on a weekly basis.

But Kim is critical of this choice. “The economically active population survey is not only used for work hours – it reveals the employment rate and the unemployment rate, making it the most important indicator for job policy. Nor was it appropriate to start basing the OECD figures on the employer survey, considering that many have argued that this survey underestimates work hours,” he said.

This was the year that Statistics Korea started using the employer survey as the basis for the figures submitted to the OECD. From 1980 until last year, first the Bank of Korea (before 2000) and then Statistics Korea (since 2000) used the economically active population survey as the basis for the employees’ annual work hours figure submitted to the OECD. But the original method of tabulating work hours conceals yet another problem: employees with less than a 30-hour workweek were given a weighted value of 0.5, while those with more than a 30-hour workweek were given a weighted value of 1.

A spokesperson for Statistics Korea provided the following explanation for this practice: “The economically active population survey assesses the work hours per week. But since these weeks frequently exclude holidays such as Seollal [the Lunar New Year] and Chuseok [the Harvest Festival], simply multiplying this to calculate annual work hours can result in an overestimate. The self-employed also have a tendency of exaggerating their working hours in their responses. That’s why some figures were given weighted values back when the Bank of Korea was submitting the annual work hour figures.”

 staff photographer)
staff photographer)

But as part-time employees have come to represent a larger share of the workforce, this method had the problematic effect of distorting annual work hours. In fact, employees working less than 30 hours a week only accounted for 4.5% of total employees in 1990, but by last year, that had increased to 10.7%. This means that South Korea’s annual work hours figure that has been used in international comparisons has been underestimated for a long time.

Each country has its own way of determining the annual work hours that they submit to the OECD. Some countries, like the US, base the figure on an employer survey; others, like the UK and New Zealand, base it on an employee survey; and still others, like Japan, combine the two methods. The approach newly adopted by South Korea, which bases the figure on the employer survey and supplements it with the employee survey, is the same as Japan’s.

The figure that the OECD published last year for South Korea’s annual work hours was 2,069, which trailed Mexico, at 2,255 hours, as the second most among the 35 OECD member states. That was 306 hours longer than the OECD average of 1,763 hours and 706 hours longer than Germany, which had the shortest working time of any OECD country, at 1,363 hours.

If South Korea’s annual work hours had been based on the economically active population survey, as Kim Yu-seon argues they should, the figure submitted to the OECD would have been 2,241, just 14 hours short of Mexico. That means that South Korea could plunge to the bottom of the OECD in this indicator at any time.

The South Korean government under President Moon Jae-in is working to achieve the goal of shortening South Koreans’ average annual work hours to below 1,900 by 2022.

By Jung Eun-joo, staff reporter

Please direct questions or comments to []

Related stories

Most viewed articles