Partners, not competitors: China protests NATO attempts to label it a “challenge”

Posted on : 2022-06-30 17:37 KST Modified on : 2022-06-30 17:37 KST
China used multiple diplomatic channels to denounce rhetoric by NATO
Leaders of NATO member nations stand for a photo in Madrid, Spain, on June 29. (AP/Yonhap News)
Leaders of NATO member nations stand for a photo in Madrid, Spain, on June 29. (AP/Yonhap News)

China is fiercely protesting attempts by the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, or NATO, a US and European security alliance, to define it as a “systemic challenge.”

As its strategic rivalry with the US intensifies, China would find its room to maneuver severely constrained if Europe assumes a stance of clear opposition.

On Tuesday, Beijing made use of numerous diplomatic channels to denounce the moves by NATO.

“China and Europe are partners rather than competitors, let alone systemic rivals,” State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi was quoted as saying.

“China will continue to follow the path of peaceful development, and develop new systems for a higher-standard open economy,” he added.

Noting that “some differences between the two sides also affect the sound development of China-EU relations from time to time,” he stressed that “the EU should form a more objective and correct perception of China’s development direction.”

Zhang Jun, China’s permanent representative to the UN, said Beijing “pays close attention to NATO strategic adjustment,” and is “deeply concerned about the policy implications of its so-called ‘Strategic Concept.’”

In a regular briefing Tuesday, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Zhao Lijian said, “NATO’s so-called new Strategic Concept is just ‘old wine in a new bottle.’”

“It still has not changed the Cold War mentality of creating imaginary enemies and bloc confrontation,” he added.

South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol stands for a photo with other NATO summit participants including King Felipe VI of Spain and US President Joe Biden on June 28, at the Royal Palace of Madrid. (Reuters/Yonhap News)
South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol stands for a photo with other NATO summit participants including King Felipe VI of Spain and US President Joe Biden on June 28, at the Royal Palace of Madrid. (Reuters/Yonhap News)

Commenting on the new strategic concept at a Monday press conference, NATO’s secretary general said the organization would “address China for the first time, and the challenges that Beijing poses to our security, interests, and values.”

Meeting with reports on his aircraft en route to Spain from Germany on Tuesday, White House national security advisor Jake Sullivan said the strategic concept would “speak very directly and in a clear-eyed way to the multifaceted challenge posed by the People’s Republic of China.”

A key document laying out the values and objectives of NATO as a military alliance, the updated strategic concept is being finalized at the June 28-30 NATO summit in Madrid.

Bloomberg quoted numerous sources as saying that NATO’s use of the term “systemic challenge” indicated feelings of alarm toward Beijing. The characterization of China as a “challenge” — after no previous mention of it in the 2010 strategic concept document or anywhere else since NATO was established in 1949 — must be seen as a major shift in the security policy approach it has maintained for the past seven decades.

After the summit officially kicked off on Wednesday, NATO leaders began discussing how to respond to Russia, which recently invaded Ukraine, and to China, which has been aligning itself with Russia.

While China has been regarding its strategic rivalry with the US as unavoidable since the 2010s, it has been striving to stay on harmonious terms with Europe. It has been focusing its energies on improving relations, including the signing of Belt and Road Initiative agreements with 16 Central and Eastern Europe countries, starting with Hungary in 2015.

Chinese Premier Li Keqiang established the “16+1 cooperation” framework for regular meetings between China and 16 European countries, aimed at reaching agreements on stronger cooperation and people-to-people exchanges in the areas of energy, distribution, infrastructure, and finance.

But seven years later, the approach has been yielding little in the way of results due to factors including Beijing’s tepid response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war.

By Choi Hyun-june, Beijing correspondent

Please direct questions or comments to [english@hani.co.kr]

button that move to original korean article (클릭시 원문으로 이동하는 버튼)

Related stories

Most viewed articles