[Interview] How has Abe stayed in power for so long?

Posted on : 2019-11-20 18:03 KST Modified on : 2019-11-20 18:03 KST
Japanese professor Yu Uchiyama weighs in on the Japanese prime minister’s political tactics
Yu Uchiyama, a professor of Japanese and comparative politics at the University of Tokyo
Yu Uchiyama, a professor of Japanese and comparative politics at the University of Tokyo

“The Shinzo Abe administration is quite adept at handling controversy. During elections, they don’t come out with policies that might draw an outcry from the public.”

Yu Uchiyama, a professor of Japanese and comparative politics in the University of Tokyo graduate program for interdisciplinary cultural studies, cited Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s “adeptness” at steering political situations as one of the secrets behind his ability to stay in power for so long. Speaking in his office at the University of Tokyo on Nov. 18, Uchiyama explained, “Policy measures like raising the consumption tax rate or amending security legislation [to allow the exercise of collective self-defense authority] were pursued when there was no election taking place.”

“Another advantage in comparison with his first time in office [in 2006-2007] is that he now has capable advisers like Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga or Executive Secretary Takaya Imai,” he added.

Uchiyama also named economic issues as perhaps the biggest secret to Abe’s longevity.

“Policies emphasizing the economy have been a big factor [in Abe becoming Prime Minister the second time]. He’s pursued right-wing policies, but he’s kept things grounded in the economy,” he said.

He also named some chance factors that combined to turn Abe into Japan’s longest-serving Prime Minister.

“Back when there were intense rivalries among factions [in the Liberal Democratic Party], it was hard for a prime minister to stay in place for very long,” he observed.

“The weakening of the party’s factions and the increase in independents has benefited politicians like Abe are popular with the public,” he noted.

Uchiyama also pointed to a “rise in passive support for the Abe administration after the failures of past Democratic Party administrations.”

“Abe has benefited from luck in many ways,” he concluded.

Superficial nature of constitutional amendment

Uchiyama predicted that if Abe does amend Japan’s Constitution, he may do so in a way that does not involve adding new Japan Self-Defense Forces provisions as he has declared. In May 2017, Abe declared that he planned to keep in place Article 9-1 and 9-2 of the current Peace Constitution -- key provisions renouncing war and rejecting the right of belligerency -- while adding new provisions providing a clear basis for establishment of the JSDF.

“Opinion polls show around half [of the Japanese public] are opposed to amending Article 9,” Uchiyama said.

“Abe may change other provisions besides Article 9 and carry out what amounts to a superficial amendment of the Constitution,” he predicted -- suggesting that Abe may emphasize the significance of simply amending a Constitution that has remained unchanged since its 1947 enactment.

Noting that enactment and amendment of security legislation has already granted the JSDF a wider scope of activities, Uchiyama said, “Realistically, nothing would change if the Constitution were amended to add JSDF-related provisions to Article 9.” According to him, the practical significance of a Constitutional amendment would not be as great as its symbolic significance.

“If anything, an amendment of the Constitution would be easier to attempt if the prime minister were someone like [LDP Policy Research Council Chairman] Fumio Kishida, who is known as one of the party’s ‘doves,’” he suggested.

Predictions for post-Abe era

Uchiyama predicted that Abe will remain a highly influential politician even after he leaves office.

“There are a lot of ‘Abe kids’ [political newcomers whose arrival was supported by Abe] in the LDP,” he noted.

Regarding Abe’s future successors as Prime Minister, Uchiyama observed, “Past LDP prime ministers have usually been in office for around two years at most.

“I don’t know if it will be that [short] after Abe, but they will probably not remain in power as long as Abe has.”

By Cho Ki-weon, Tokyo correspondent

Please direct comments or questions to [english@hani.co.kr]

button that move to original korean article (클릭시 원문으로 이동하는 버튼)

Related stories

Most viewed articles