North Korea’s reconstruction should be viewed as integration, not reunification

Posted on : 2018-06-14 16:51 KST Modified on : 2019-10-19 20:29 KST
Samsung Securities report suggests “Complete, Visible, Irreversible Prosperity” on Korean Peninsula
A report from the Samsung Securities North Korean investment strategy team
A report from the Samsung Securities North Korean investment strategy team

The standards for calculating the costs of North Korea’s economic reconstruction should be discussed in terms of “integration” rather than “reunification,” analysts are arguing.

Analysts also predicted the city of Wonsan is likely to become a landmark for North Korean economic openness.

A June 13 report by the Samsung Securities North Korean investment strategy team titled “Toward the CVIP Era on the Korean Peninsula” outlined possible scenarios for inter-Korean economic cooperation, predicting the recent North Korea-US summit in Singapore would become a “historic inflection point” with “an economy arriving in place of nuclear weapons and missiles.”

A video made by the White House that US President Donald Trump showed to North Korean leader Kim Jong-un during their Singapore summit on June 12
A video made by the White House that US President Donald Trump showed to North Korean leader Kim Jong-un during their Singapore summit on June 12

The “CVIP” in the title is an acronym for “complete, visible, irreversible prosperity.”

As a standard for calculating the costs of rebuilding the North Korean economy, Samsung Securities first introduced the concept of the “integration costs” needed to maintain peace and prosperity. Noting that the past “reunification cost” concept presumed a German-style absorption scenario, the report argued the situation should be approached through a “gradual economic integration” framework with international acknowledgement of the North Korean regime.

Applying the “integration cost” calculation standard reduces costs significantly from South Korea’s standpoint. It would not require the economic promotion and social security expenditures included in German-style reunification costs; instead, costs would be channeled chiefly into rebuilding North Korean infrastructure.

“South Korea may enjoy benefits including reduced defense costs, an end to ideology and system maintenance costs, economies of scale, and organic linkage of the South and North Korean regional economies, while North Korea can reduce the role of its defense industry and obtain effects in terms of adjusting its distorted industry structure,” Samsung Securities predicted.

 featuring references to a future where both North and South Korea are prosperous. (YouTube)
featuring references to a future where both North and South Korea are prosperous. (YouTube)

Reparations from Japan could become seed money for North Korea’s reconstruction

The report also mentioned North Korea’s right to claim damages from Japan as a major resource for reconstruction. The prediction is that North Korea might be able to exercise its claims for “seed money” just as other countries victimized by Japanese invasions in the past – including South Korea, Vietnam, and the Philippines – used compensation from Japan to invest in various forms of infrastructure.

The amount of compensation was estimated at around US$20 billion. If North Korea does establish itself as a “normal state,” it would also be entitled to international support funds from the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and other sources, while a trust fund for North Korea’s development could be spearheaded by South Korea, the report suggested.

The report predicted that investment in construction, construction materials, and energy would be key in the initial stage of inter-Korean economic cooperation (“building an economic base and trust”), with a strong likelihood of early openness coming chiefly through North Korea’s special economic districts. In particular, it predicted that the Wonsan special economic zone – which is leader Kim Jong-un’s hometown and is linked to Mt. Keumgang – would become a landmark.

During the second stage (“reducing distrust and expanding openness”), South and North Korea may be able to jointly pursue resource development and invest in increasing value added from resources, it predicted. During this process, benefits were seen as likely to extend to the resource development, tourism, and distribution industries. The report also predicted financial industry support would be expanded to the private sector.

The third and final stage (“practical investment and full-scale cooperation”) could result in North Korea becoming a base of export industry production like the Eastern Europe of the past, the report said. Information technology (IT) and automobile assembly plants could be built in the North, and financial market openness would become possible.

On June 7, Samsung Securities became the first company to establish a dedicated North Korea research team to publish a report.

North Korean investment strategy team director Yu Seung-min said, “With differing assessments of the summit on June 12, the market appears likely to reflect that in a neutral way for the time being, but people’s hopes appear likely to be met as more meetings take place going ahead.”

“North Korea is expected to focus on pursuing economic development through its special districts and development districts to achieve development while maintaining regime security,” Yu added.

By Park Su-ji, staff reporter

Please direct comments or questions to [english@hani.co.kr]

button that move to original korean article (클릭시 원문으로 이동하는 버튼)

Related stories

Most viewed articles