Unification Minister nominee stresses need for resumption of North Korea-US dialogue

Posted on : 2019-03-27 17:06 KST Modified on : 2019-03-27 17:06 KST
Pledges to maintain positive loop between inter-Korean peace and economic development
Minister of Unification nominee Kim Yeon-chul responds to questions from lawmakers during his confirmation hearing before the National Assembly Foreign Affairs and Unification Committee on Mar. 26. (Yonhap News)
Minister of Unification nominee Kim Yeon-chul responds to questions from lawmakers during his confirmation hearing before the National Assembly Foreign Affairs and Unification Committee on Mar. 26. (Yonhap News)

Minister of Unification nominee Kim Yeon-chul stressed the need for “continued improvements to inter-Korean relations” in order to “promote the resumption of North Korea-US dialogue and drive the establishment of permanent peace.”

Speaking at his confirmation hearing before the National Assembly Foreign Affairs and Unification Committee on Mar. 26, Kim said he intends to “look for creative ways of helping North Korea and the US meet again quickly and find common ground.”

Stressed that North Korea “fundamentally cannot have both nuclear weapons and a functioning economy at the same time,” Kim stressed the need to “use the North’s strategy of focusing on economic development as an element to hasten denuclearization.”

He went on to say he would “look for different approaches” as Minister of Unification, including a Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program rather than the current coercive approach to denuclearization. The CTR approach, he explained, “resolves issues at the source by dismantling nuclear and missile facilities and substituting them with industry in those regions.” He also pledged to “establish a positive feedback loop between peace and the economy.”

Kim also said it was “quite noteworthy in itself” that the recent North Korea-US summit in Hanoi included discussions of so-called “snapback” provisions, which would allow the lifting of sanctions but restore them in the event of a violation by the North.

“The North has stated its willingness to abandon [the nuclear facilities at] Yongbyon, and it is being reported that the US may consider [the establishment of] a liaison office, an end-of-war declaration, and a snapback provision,” he said.

“In light of all these things, I think it may be possible to establish a new plan,” he added.

The ruling and opposition parties remain sharply divided over Kim’s proposed policy course. Lawmakers with the ruling Democratic Party lauded Kim as a “top expert,” while opposition lawmakers Choung Byoung-gug from the Bareunmirae Party and Kim Moo-sung from the Liberty Korea Party (LKP) respectively denounced him as a “North Korea mouthpiece” and “pro-Pyongyang.”

In his opening statement, Kim addressed the controversy over his somewhat coarse past statements on social media expressing his political and policy views.

“I would like to apologize deeply for having wounded the feelings of others,” he said.

In spite of this, opposition lawmakers continued their attack, with LKP lawmaker Chun Jin-suk describing Kim’s mental state as “not normal.” On the ruling party side, lawmakers Song Young-gil and Lee In-young pleaded with Kim to “behave cautiously.” Opposition lawmakers also continued to attack Kim’s past remarks concerning the shooting of South Korean tourist Park Wang-ja at the Mt. Kumgang resort and the sinking of the ROKS Cheonan.

Meanwhile, LKP lawmaker Yoo Ki-june focused questions on whether Kim and his wife had signed several so-called “down contracts” prior to the 2006 institution of the real estate actual transaction reporting system. Kim acknowledged the allegations, saying he had “not tended to things closely before 2006” and was “deeply remorseful.”

By Lee Je-hun, senior staff writer, and Noh Ji-won, staff reporter

Please direct comments or questions to [english@hani.co.kr]

button that move to original korean article (클릭시 원문으로 이동하는 버튼)

Most viewed articles