[Column] The foreign policy issue that could decide the US presidential election

Posted on : 2024-02-26 17:19 KST Modified on : 2024-02-26 17:19 KST
A number of global issues should weigh heavily on the minds of Americans this year, but only one may decide the election
Immigrants who crossed the Rio Grande into the United States head toward an intake facility in Eagle Pass, Texas, on Sept. 23, 2024. (AP/Yonhap)
Immigrants who crossed the Rio Grande into the United States head toward an intake facility in Eagle Pass, Texas, on Sept. 23, 2024. (AP/Yonhap)

By John Feffer, author and director of Foreign Policy in Focus at the Institute for Policy Studies

Presidential elections in the United States are almost always decided by domestic issues. Once in a while, a global concern like terrorism or a particular war will affect voters’ choices. But Americans care most about their own livelihoods: jobs, housing, the cost of food. 

In 2024, a number of global issues should weigh heavily on the minds of Americans. There’s the overwhelming threat of climate change. Voters should also care deeply about the horrific destruction of the Palestinian community in Gaza and the ongoing efforts of Ukrainians to defend their country.

But there’s really only one foreign policy issue that could decide the election in November. That issue is immigration.

America is a country of immigrants. It also desperately needs immigrants to do all the jobs that native-born Americans generally don’t want to do: pick vegetables, process meat, care for the elderly, do low-paid construction work. The unemployment rate in the United States is currently around 3.7 percent. Historically, that is very low. Many of the job sectors that have traditionally employed immigrants — health care, landscaping, cleaning services, restaurant work — have the greatest number of open positions at the moment.

Despite the need for these workers, many Americans believe falsely that immigrants are taking away their jobs. Polling by Gallup shows that more than a quarter of the American population thinks that immigration, on balance, is a bad thing. Compared to 2020, when only 28 percent of Americans thought that immigration should be decreased, that number rose to 41 percent by June 2023.

Republican Party politicians, in particular, are following these trends. Republicans have been busy politicizing the border issue in order to distract voters from the rather obvious fact that the US economy is doing pretty well, at least according to most conventional metrics. Republicans in the House of Representatives impeached the member of the Biden cabinet who is responsible for immigration policy. The same Republicans have tried to push a bill through Congress that would make it much more difficult for people to cross the US border and claim asylum. Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, has sent busloads of undocumented migrants to cities in the north, such as New York, controlled by Democrats. 

And Donald Trump, the Republican frontrunner for president, has declared that migrants are “poisoning the blood of our country.” This language is very similar to the rhetoric of Nazis and white supremacists. 

The Republicans — and some Democrats — have also framed the border issue as a “crisis” that requires a military response comparable to how the United States is helping Ukraine and Israel. In terms of statistics, there has indeed been an increase in undocumented persons crossing the border. In December 2023, nearly 250,000 migrants encountered the US Border Patrol, a new record. In January, however, those numbers fell by half.

The upward trend in border-crossings is the result of a number of developments. Fully one-fifth of the migrants in December came from Venezuela, a country whose population has decreased dramatically as a result of political repression, economic decline, and rising crime. Similar factors have pushed people out of Nicaragua, Cuba and Haiti. Beginning in 2021, Nicaragua abolished visa requirements for Cubans, Haitians, Senegalese, Indians, Uzbeks and others. In addition to boosting the fortunes of Nicaraguan travel companies, the government there is consciously hoping to destabilize the United States, a long-time enemy of Nicaraguan leader Daniel Ortega. Fully 10 percent of the people trying to get across the US border have passed through Nicaragua. 

The Biden administration is considering proposals to tighten some of the rules governing asylum. That might include shutting down the border if numbers rise above a certain level, such as an average of 5,000 per day in one week. Frankly, Biden is worried that he will lose the election because he isn’t “tough enough” on immigration. So, he has moved to the right on this issue to appeal to conservative Democrats, moderate Republicans, and independents.

In order to secure Republican support, the Democrats even tried to include tighter immigration restrictions in a bill that combined military aid to Ukraine, Israel and Taiwan. But the Republicans ended up rejecting that bill because the immigration provisions were not tight enough and some Republicans opposed military aid for Ukraine. So, once again, Congress has failed to come up with any consensus on immigration reform, even though there is broad consensus on such policies as increasing funding for border control. 

Donald Trump and the Republicans have pinned the blame for this political failure on the Biden administration. Biden, meanwhile, has declared that “every day between now and November the American people are going to know the only reason the border is not secure is Donald Trump and his MAGA Republican friends.”

Instead of pouring money into border control, however, the United States should be helping to improve conditions on the ground in the countries from which so many of these migrants are coming. The Biden administration has provided several hundred million dollars to Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador. But it’s not enough to make a difference.

The United States also needs to figure out ways of dealing with Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela. There are ways of helping people on the ground—through trade and greater information exchange — without directly benefiting the dictators of those countries. The Obama administration’s rapprochement with Cuba, which facilitated the flow of trade and tourism dollars into the country, should serve as a model. 

Migrants not only contribute enormously to the economic success of the United States. They also, through remittances to their families back home, contribute to the economic success of their countries of birth. These remittances are many times greater than the bilateral assistance the US government provides.

In other words, migrants are not the problem. Both in the United States and in their countries of origin, migrants are the solution.

Please direct questions or comments to [english@hani.co.kr]

button that move to original korean article (클릭시 원문으로 이동하는 버튼)

Related stories