[Editorial] Yoon addresses nation, but not problems that plague it

Posted on : 2024-04-02 16:52 KST Modified on : 2024-04-02 17:53 KST
The president did not share an exit strategy for the stalemate between his administration and doctors, instead underscoring his “my way or the highway” approach
President Yoon Suk-yeol delivers an address to the nation regarding health care reforms on April 1, 2024, from the presidential office in Seoul. (courtesy of the presidential office)
President Yoon Suk-yeol delivers an address to the nation regarding health care reforms on April 1, 2024, from the presidential office in Seoul. (courtesy of the presidential office)

On Monday, South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol delivered a televised message to the nation. It was his third such statement to the public since taking office, and it drew considerable attention, coming as it did with the general election just around the corner.

But in the course of that 51-minute message, Yoon made it clear that he has no intention of changing his approach to affairs of state. It included no signs of reflection on or adjustments to any aspect of his administration, including the issue of increasing the nationwide medical college admission cap, which is showing signs of dragging into the long term.

The statement was focused on health care reforms, including the cap increase, which has become the biggest issue today.

Yoon devoted considerable time to explaining why the increase needed to be 2,000 seats. Offering a point-by-point rebuttal of the medical community’s claims, he signaled his commitment to not repeating the same frustrations and failures met by past administrations.

At the same time, he did not share any kind of exit strategy for escaping the current stalemate in the conflict between the administration and physicians.

Whatever the justification may be for these reforms, the public starts to feel increasingly fatigued when things drag out for too long. The same is true for increasing the medical college admission cap.

Meanwhile, the health care vacuum created by the long-term collective action by interns, residents, and other physicians has gone beyond the level of a “concern” to become an urgent reality.

To be sure, the physicians have crossed the line with their actions, rejecting any kind of negotiations while demanding discussions on walking the government’s plan back and scrapping it completely. The public is well aware of this as well. But they’re also feeling frustrated with their president.

In his statement, Yoon stressed that politics is about “resolving issues that relate to our public.” If that’s the case, an emphasis on “principles” and “commitment” is not enough — the statement should also have included some approach that might at least lead to a resolution of this problem.

Without any of those kinds of preparations, he simply kicked the ball over to the physicians, calling on them to “come up with a unified proposal.” Is this any way to resolve the issue? As the confrontation between doctors and the administration drags on, it’s innocent South Koreans who end up suffering.

There are many other issues that the government is dealing with besides the medical school admission cap. The president should be offering answers on matters such as livelihood struggles — including skyrocketing inflation, with no signs of countermeasures — and the appointment and subsequent resignation of Lee Jong-sup as ambassador to Australia.

Many in the ruling People Power Party have been calling for days on end for the president to show some signs of concession, amid growing worries about the prospects of an election defeat. But Yoon made no mention of this.

Instead, he spoke of his record of “boldly implementing even unpopular policies,” citing achievements with his hard-line response to a Cargo Truckers’ Solidarity Division strike, fiscal soundness, improving relations with Japan, and restoring the nuclear power ecosystem.

While he mentioned these as a way of emphasizing his commitment to health care reforms, it came across as reiterating his “my way or the highway” approach.

A day earlier, he vowed to be “humbler” and “listen to even the smallest voices from the public.” Was this just empty rhetoric? We can only wonder why he delivered this statement to the public at all.

Please direct questions or comments to [english@hani.co.kr]

button that move to original korean article (클릭시 원문으로 이동하는 버튼)

Related stories